F56
Guys, how do you know she is into you?
December 13 2013
Comments
-
Tall74nHard9
12 years ago
Quoting 'Stir_it_alot' They both shared a common intent..... Stealth..... - Posted from rhpmobile The SR71 was not designed as a "stealth" aircraft as we know them today. It was done by "stealth' by being designed to fly efficiently at extremely high altitudes out of a persons vision, as well as radar of the day. Plus the Blackbird was purely a spy aircraft with no weapons capability. The Nighthawk on the other hand was designed as a modern stealth aircraft with specially designed fuselage and wing shapes, plus advanced coatings to reduce it's radar signature whilst being operable during normally night-time missions. It is a purpose designed bomber - different animal. I know it may be splitting hairs as far as the determination of "stealth" is concerned, but they were built in different era's, where designed to vastly different maxims, and had different operational briefs. Do you have an interest in aviation ? Cheers,Tall
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'SirSwan' I am, more often than not, completely oblivious and have more than once misread someone being friendly as something else entirely. It's not often (read. Extremely bloody rare) a woman asks me out for drinks, so when they do I tend misjudge the situation and have been shot down in flames. There's also been many an occasion when I haven't noticed she's trying it on, I go to say good bye and either get dragged off and called a dumb ass or get the text messages saying "are you not interested in me?" To which my response is "...? I didn't think you were interested in me that way...". Even the lads at work reckoning oblivious. Apparently I get a lot of looks and they here more than a few whispers about me from the nurses. None of which I pick up on. Yeah, I'd say I'm oblivious. There's something really hot about sexy guys who have no clue of their effect on women. Confidence is one thing, but so often the line of arrogance is heavily petted with by the ones who KNOW they have power. Stay cute and oblivious Sir :)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' Quoting 'Stir_it_alot' They both shared a common intent..... Stealth..... - Posted from rhpmobile The SR71 was not designed as a "stealth" aircraft as we know them today. It was done by "stealth' by being designed to fly efficiently at extremely high altitudes out of a persons vision, as well as radar of the day. Plus the Blackbird was purely a spy aircraft with no weapons capability. The Nighthawk on the other hand was designed as a modern stealth aircraft with specially designed fuselage and wing shapes, plus advanced coatings to reduce it's radar signature whilst being operable during normally night-time missions. It is a purpose designed bomber - different animal. I know it may be splitting hairs as far as the determination of "stealth" is concerned, but they were built in different era's, where designed to vastly different maxims, and had different operational briefs. Do you have an interest in aviation ? Cheers,Tall was actually supposed to be the RS-71, however the US President at the time got it wrong when he made a speech about the aircraft. Lockheed spend a heap of $$ re-naming all the drawings rather than correct him..
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Navels (planes) to know whether or not someone is interested. Lol
-
madotara69
12 years ago
Quoting 'Awesome71' Navels (planes) to know whether or not someone is interested. Lol You see, we can build them, we understand how they work, shit we can make them so they can look up someone's arsehole at 10 000 feet away. That we have no trouble putting the heads together to come up with precise answers. But Women, trying to figure out how they work is a little to sophisticated, best to hope things work out as there is no plan to be sure we men can read and be sure to know about the lady, precisely. Mado Mado Tara xx
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Awesome71' Navels (planes) to know whether or not someone is interested. Lol Nah, the SR-71 was Air Force CheersJAB
-
Tall74nHard9
12 years ago
Quoting 'JustAnotherBloke' Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' Quoting 'Stir_it_alot' They both shared a common intent..... Stealth..... - Posted from rhpmobile The SR71 was not designed as a "stealth" aircraft as we know them today. It was done by "stealth' by being designed to fly efficiently at extremely high altitudes out of a persons vision, as well as radar of the day. Plus the Blackbird was purely a spy aircraft with no weapons capability. The Nighthawk on the other hand was designed as a modern stealth aircraft with specially designed fuselage and wing shapes, plus advanced coatings to reduce it's radar signature whilst being operable during normally night-time missions. It is a purpose designed bomber - different animal. I know it may be splitting hairs as far as the determination of "stealth" is concerned, but they were built in different era's, where designed to vastly different maxims, and had different operational briefs. Do you have an interest in aviation ? Cheers,Tall was actually supposed to be the RS-71, however the US President at the time got it wrong when he made a speech about the aircraft. Lockheed spend a heap of $$ re-naming all the drawings rather than correct him.. Haven't heard that one before - but sounds like the way it works there in good ol USA. Lockheed probably upped the price on their next few projects to may sure they got their money back. Tall
-
Tall74nHard9
12 years ago
Quoting 'madotara69' Quoting 'Awesome71' Navels (planes) to know whether or not someone is interested. Lol You see, we can build them, we understand how they work, shit we can make them so they can look up someone's arsehole at 10 000 feet away. That we have no trouble putting the heads together to come up with precise answers. But Women, trying to figure out how they work is a little to sophisticated, best to hope things work out as there is no plan to be sure we men can read and be sure to know about the lady, precisely. Mado Mado Tara xx Truer words were never spoken my lad. Haha Tall
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' Quoting 'JustAnotherBloke' Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' Quoting 'Stir_it_alot' They both shared a common intent..... Stealth..... - Posted from rhpmobile The SR71 was not designed as a "stealth" aircraft as we know them today. It was done by "stealth' by being designed to fly efficiently at extremely high altitudes out of a persons vision, as well as radar of the day. Plus the Blackbird was purely a spy aircraft with no weapons capability. The Nighthawk on the other hand was designed as a modern stealth aircraft with specially designed fuselage and wing shapes, plus advanced coatings to reduce it's radar signature whilst being operable during normally night-time missions. It is a purpose designed bomber - different animal. I know it may be splitting hairs as far as the determination of "stealth" is concerned, but they were built in different era's, where designed to vastly different maxims, and had different operational briefs. Do you have an interest in aviation ? Cheers,Tall was actually supposed to be the RS-71, however the US President at the time got it wrong when he made a speech about the aircraft. Lockheed spend a heap of $$ re-naming all the drawings rather than correct him.. Haven't heard that one before - but sounds like the way it works there in good ol USA. Lockheed probably upped the price on their next few projects to may sure they got their money back. Tall of "Skunk Works" by Ben Rich. He was Kelly Johnson's protege, and initially got involved in super-secret type stuff when he worked on the design of the SR-71's air intakes. He later took over from Kelly, and was the driving force behind the F-117 Nighthawk. Great book
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Can we please get back on topic before this thread gets canned?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Meeka, it's not that guys just don't have a clue, its that guys have simple minds and I believe you have answered the dilemma in your original post. Do you continue with the subtle approach, possibly so subtle or broadly defined that a normal guy wouldn't pick up on it or see it as a definite sign, regardless of how clear you believe you are being ? Or do you just whip your tits out and say come and get it ? Well I believe the answer is.............the middle ground of the two examples you gave. Most guys when seeing a girl give a 'subtle' sign, like running their hand through their hair, think that she is just fixing her hair like she does the other 100 times that day. At the other end of the scale, most guys that see a woman just whip her tits out would probably then be classed as fair game by all males in that place. Why not just meet in the middle and leave the subtle signs out of it as the average male does NOT pick up on it. And there's no need to whip your tits out when you can simply do as males have ALWAYS had to do and get up, get confident and approach the guy that you like and tell him. I have had a chick in the past, approach me at a club, ask me for a dance [which is very rare for me to accept Lol], then shoves her tongue down my throat on the dance floor as well as grind her ass against my cock on the dance floor, but then when I offered to buy her a drink her response was "don't think just because I accept a drink that it means you get to fuck me". Ummmmm, I wasn't, but the tongue down my throat and your ass grinding against my cock would of, I thought, classed as a "subtle" sign, but apparently not. No sign from a woman, subtle or not, will then explain or justify a cock teaser or their actions. That bit always gets left out of the instruction manual. Those cock teasers then cause future confession for men as then he thinks "is that a subtle sign, or is it another cock teaser looking to boost her own confidence at our expense ? Where does the line of subtle flirting and cock teasing get drawn ? Best advice I can offer. Male or female, if you like someone and you think that they may have some interest at least in you, then get up, approach them and take the approach that "if you don't ask, then you'll never know'. I don't take it personally if I get shot down [as long as its done with some level of class], but at least I know where I stand and can move on. And as we enter this age of equality, there should be a whole lot more approaching from women to men if all things are going to be equal. And when I say approaching, I mean saying what you mean, leaving the subtle clues, flirts and cryptic hints out of it. Leave the flirting for the 15 year old school kids where it belongs. I was even approached as little as 2 weeks ago by a 19 year old female to tell me that her 25 year old female friend was very interested in me. Seriously but...........a 25 year old woman can't come and say this to me so I hear it from her own mouth instead of being confused and wondering if it was yet another case of a woman trying to play cupid or match maker for her friend. You do NOT have to agree with what I just wrote, but I do ask that it gets taken in the context of which I wrote it and meant. This is NOT an attempt to bash or trash women, this is purely addressing the opening post with some examples and thoughts from the male perspective. But Meeka, I applaud you for raising the subject, as a discussion from both sexes on these issues is the ONLY way we will learn to truly get along down the track. I believe that we are ALL individuals, and that is why I will never accept the version of selective equality that is being shoved down our throats by the same people who previously told us to accept our roles in society. Isn;t it funny that as soon as THEY change their agenda, society has to as well. But when a society has been mentally conditioned to thinking a certain way, you can't just click your fingers and expect instant change. There is a transitional stage and that is the very stage our society is now in.
-
Tall74nHard9
12 years ago
Thanks JAB ... will have to look out for that. Would love to be a fly in the wall at the skunk-works - imagine what they are probably up to now without us knowing about it. Clever buggers that lot. Cheers,Tall
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' Thanks JAB ... will have to look out for that. Would love to be a fly in the wall at the skunk-works - imagine what they are probably up to now without us knowing about it. Clever buggers that lot. Cheers,Tall No worries, Tall. Another couple well worth a read are "Flak" and "Fly" by Michael Veitch...a series of interviews with Aussie WWII aircrew. CheersJAB
-
RHP User
12 years ago
To much can be misinterpreted as is on web communication. Make it simple, if you have to flirt, exchange numbers then go for it. Chicks dont like me if they dont share numbers with me thats how i see it.
-
madotara69
12 years ago
If her toes are curled, that means either she is into you, or you happen to be there at the right time for what ever is on her mind. Mado Tara xx
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Lol constipation makes toes curl lol Also causes haemorrhoids lol :p - Posted from rhpmobile
-
madotara69
12 years ago
It takes us back to just how complicated the signs expressed from the ladies, can be perceived. It's not all bells and whistles, there is factors to consider. Good point, Stir
-
RHP User
12 years ago
When a guy is made aware that a girl is interested, the eagerness for us to pursue her is immediately cut in half. The truth is, we never know when a girl is interested because that is up to us to find out for ourselves. Confidence is the key. I don't care how good looking any guy is, lack of confidence will be your downfall. I'm not exactly unattractive, I'm not exactly attractive. But I'm a confident bloke who knows how to approach women and not with the sole purpose of fucking them that night. That is where the game is flawed by so many.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Your generalisation that all guys interests are halved when we know a woman is interested is an absolute joke. In your context, it comes down to whether you're turned on by the hunt, or the quality of the interaction that follows.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
So that is interesting. A guy loses interested when he knows a women is interested in him. LMAO. So we need to treat you mean to keep you keen?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Well the situation is a major factor here of course. But for myself, yes, when I know a woman is keen on me, I tend to lose interest. It's not so much the mean and keen scenario, I prefer going in first, immediately spark interest and take it from there. Call me arrogant if you want, but I'm just myself. I love it that way. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
If a woman is keen you can see it in the way she looks at you....it's pretty damn obvious most of the time.....occasionally I have got things wrong but she was high as a kite so that doesn't count ;)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'JayJay_66' I am very straight forward...yet still sadly some guys just don't click to it! Maybe they are in shock and not really picking up that I have just offered my body!! I find that too with some. I've even had to resort to the bold statement of "well, do you want to fuck" when he was not taking the subtle 'sensible date' hints.
-
On_Safari
12 years ago
My first real date in a very long time. Things were going well, conversation flowed, used Mes' subtle gestures like facing him at our table our legs touching. This went on for an hour or two but I still couldn't tell if he was interested or not. It wasn't our first meeting either as we'd had lunch some 6-8 weeks prior and I left that encounter wondering if I'd ticked any boxes for him then too. So me being me and not being a complete shrinking violet in a pause of chatting and listening to the band says "So. Is this where one of us is supposed to make the first move?" He paused, looked at me, smiled and said do you want to go?" I said yes, I can drop you home if you're ready. Got to the carpark and he grabbed my waist, spun me around and pashed me. Lol we didn't make it to his place but a beach about 15km away. He was very satisfying, the next morning he txt that his lips were swollen and his jaw was sore....I laughed guiltily and said it sounded like his face had had an excellent time!! Hahahaha he now refers to me as Genie, for the magic I bring. You were equally magical Sir. Can't wait to catch up again over coffee. I guess sometimes you never know unless you have a go. 😳 Maybe I'm still too subtle?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Called body talk which was aired on British TV. Fantastic viewing that I would recommend to anyone. They setup a "love pad" that was riddled with cameras, invited 10 members of each sex in and they analysed the body language of the interactions that were taking place without anyone knowing. Filled in quite a lot of useful information I can attest. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Body language, body language, body language.. Have I said that enough?When a woman smiles and keeps her eyes on you, turns to face you and her whole body suggests she's engaging, that's a good indication for me.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
The clues are obvious. My problem is it takes me about 18 months to notice them and by that time she's probably gone.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I meet a lady from RHP for dinner and, very early in the date, I mentioned I have troubles making the first move as I don't want to offend. She grabbed me, plant a delicious kiss on me and told me "Now that's out of the road, relax and enjoy." What a great night. Unfortunately, I can't use that line on an RHP lady ever again. disclaimer: The quote may not be exact but I the kiss left me a little light headed.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
A lot of guys will pretend they disagree with me, but ladies ..... the majority of us have no clue whatsoever, lol. You drop subtle hints that you think would be obvious, but males just aren't good at picking up on subtle hints. That's just the way we are. Maybe try some not-quite-so-subtle hints, and watch how good we can pick up on them, lol
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'MrFebruary' That's just the way we are. When we're born we shit ourselves for the first two years..... thats just the way we are. And then.... we learn a better way.
-
madotara69
12 years ago
he he
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I guess..... I disagreed with him lol
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Yes but the important point is that you are still full of shit. 😆
-
RHP User
12 years ago
What about you haven't physically met a woman yet? that you been chatting online for a month or two.. swapping ideas, stories, secrets, etc.. but not one single intimate sexy chats?? would there be signs in there as well?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Apparently if you're expecting a woman to club you over the head, it ain't gonna happen lol :) - Posted from rhpmobile
-
Lovinit28andKC72
12 years ago
On the woman I guess stir, I'd be happy to club you over the head.....😜 - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
It's simple She is still replying ;-)........ PS Meeks.... I live you too lol
-
RHP User
12 years ago
on whether it's someone I've just met in a bar, or a long term friend. If it's someone I've just met and they're making heaps of eye contact and flirting then I get those signals loud and clear. It's when I've been friends with someone for a while that I miss the signals as I take it as a friendship thing and don't want to ruin that. Also, I may fancy someone else who is married and wouldn't pick up on their signals, as even though I have an open marriage, I don't expect most other people to be in the same boat as me. It's a bit more straightforward on here though luckily. Basically, what I'm saying is I'm too naive and don't have a clue most of the time :)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Good point..
-
RHP User
12 years ago
tho... blabbering in chat/skype for a while.. and turns out via mutual female friend, that she's not into me.. I guess I still got a lot to figure it out. :P
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Mischeviouslad' It's simple She is still replying ;-)........ PS Meeks.... I live you too lol Oh come on. I thought that was very clever come back.
-
sungf1t
12 years ago
Hehe I'll take the plunge if I'm half sure an go an have a good nite regardless of what happens!! There is a difference when typing flirting an hank panky.. But I mean if your up to that stage in msgs you'd have to be a bit brain dead not to pick up on something?? I could be wrong!! An if im not 85% sure I like to read body language, the way she may look at you sometimes changes,sometimes you can just feel it!! But mostly I use my words carefully to extract information to know more! I swear every women is different thou so yea maybe to some guys they think you are flirting as maybe the last women he came across may not of been as forward or she was more of the upfront type!! Or Maybe he should just learn to read between the lines lol
-
RHP User
12 years ago
It's hard to keep track of. A woman is interested if she brushes her hair to the left under a waning moon while a dog barks three times in the distance and her eyebrows raise 2.5mm... well, there's a lot of things to keep track of. ;) Back in the day when I was completely clueless I walked out of the bathroom to find the girl who was over lying on my bed in her underwear. I still wasn't 100% sure. More recently I was at a xmas party and a friend there, well, I was picking up something, but figured she was just drunk. As I left she walked me outside then started kissing me. This was a good indication. Again I thought maybe drunk, but she said she'd wanted to do it for a very long time. That said, she spent NYE with another guy and cancelled on me since, so I suppose I was wrong. So often you would swear a woman is into you, everyone who sees what's going on (male and female) agree, only to be told they were just being friendly. There's wanting attention and wanting to be with you. On the other end of the scale I've had women who appeared to be giving me the cold shoulder, wanting nothing to do with me, complaining later I didn't pick up on their signals...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
haha was trying to arrange a meet, but keep getting told to shoosh......no clue... in the end just didnt happen because he was too impatient and became heated about it....shame really
-
RHP User
12 years ago
sounds like you really didnt pick up on their signals...to them that's you being disinterested in them
-
RHP User
12 years ago
im a bit like you...prefer the men to show interest than beg for attention....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
fantastic insight...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I have to admit, that when it comes to down to it, I am absolutely clueless. mind you this could be due to the fact that only a select few have ever found me sexually appealing lol No idea at all. I have had a few long term gfs, but how it happened is beyond me *blushes and giggles*
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I was thinking about this today. Are our signals a bit too subtle thus someone doesn't pick up on them, or are they being ignored because the other person isn't interested?
-
Lovinit28andKC72
12 years ago
Ok who is he lovely???? - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Lovinit28' Ok who is he lovely???? - Posted from rhpmobile He is Quality, of course
-
Lovinit28andKC72
12 years ago
I would expect nothing less from you.......💋 - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
If I like you, I'm pretty obvious about it. I'll find anyway of getting your phone number or snapchat, then I send very suggestive nudes (and regular nudes) regularly and talk about sex a lot :D
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I need signals as subtle as an air raid-siren before I catch on. Once I catch on, though... ;-) As the saying goes "he could fall into a barrel of tits and come out sucking his thumb..."
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 15118 Comments: 88287
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1417 Comments: 10254
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2519 Comments: 11672
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2506 Comments: 9772
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 1005 Comments: 5234
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1302 Comments: 5788
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 782 Comments: 1993
-
LGBT
Topics: 170 Comments: 869
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share