Princess

I'd been sceptical of girls who style themselves 'Princess'. The word felt like an easy, shallow disguise covering greed and narcissm, I thought, and I couldn't see much scope for depth, much that would be worthwhile.

But recently I have radically changed my view. It is, of course, a woman who has caused this change of heart. She is young, pretty, clever, sweet, generous, kind, considerate, polite, friendly, and a pleasure to know. A Princess, in other words. But she is also quite clear that she wants the men she allows close to show deep submissiveness to her.

So doesn't that make her a Mistress, like so many other dominant women who appear here? Yes, but what sets her apart, and why I think Princess is such a good word to capture her essence, is she has no interest in inflicting pain or humiliation. Her response to a male who shows disrespect is not to whip him, but to cease contact with him. In some ways, her dominance is much more extreme than the woman who carries a whip, because the slave is permanently in the last chance saloon. He has to accept that one word, one response, that displeases her could result in his being cast adrift. It is such a sobering thought!

She also posts a lot of pictures of herself, which create a clear image in the viewer's mind. There is a strong sense of sexuality in her pictures, but an ambiguity too. In most she wears a costume that reflects common fantasies, a uniform perhaps, or a character from a story, a Disney princess or Cinderella. In many her poses are deliberately naive, some even childlike, and the pictures are shot against a strong white background giving them a chaste, almost virginal purity. The male viewer is left feeling aroused, but with a strong sense that she will always be out of reach because she is a fantasy figure or, in those that reflect a real character, she doesn't mirror the viewer's feeling of arousal. A Princess, in other words, because we know they exist, but we know we will never reach them.

And yet she also wears a bangle, adorned with the keys of chastity devices her slaves wear. The message is clear: she does exist for some men, but if he is to be allowed close to her a man must be caged. And as any man who has worn one will know, a chastity device has the effect of amplifying male sexual desire very strongly, while also denying it. In similar vein, men have little idea how their sexuality is viewed by the Princess. She manages to both want their arousal and to forbid it. She's far cleverer than they are, and the only safe option with her is to behave as if it doesn't exist.

And that makes her dominance complete, which in turn makes her utterly irresistible. Because how can a submissive man be satisfied with anything other than the most pure and perfect dominant?