RHP

RHP User

M57 F49

fat or skinny

April 20 2011

Do you like fatter men, or skinnier men? my man is what i would call cuddly, he has a tummy, and a body you feel so safe hugging. I am not into skinny boys, and by the way I like woman with a little body on them. What do you guys think Kisses Mrs Mum

Comments

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    But, like a train wreck, I can't look away even if i don't like what i see, and as i recall, it never ends up in a place I like to be.I like what i like and I like that you like what you like even if i don't like what you like and you don't like what i like, i'd like to think we can all be grownups about it, but like we're likely to read from here on in, some people don't like it like that.xx Sarah (likes the sound of her own tippy-tapping typing)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    i like that you use the word like lots, i like that and we like you, like you know! like,like like one day you might message Mr Mum and I X Mrs Mum

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    sounds like the Fat v Skinny war is about to errupt again. Me i much rather thin over fat

  • Tart_Du_Jour

    Tart_Du_Jour

    15 years ago

    I like men with big throbbing.... brains, personally.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I like Baise_Moi. Have I told you how beautiful you are lately? xx Meeks

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I don't like really lean or skinny guys. I think I would say I like average guys with a smart brain and very naughty eyes. That usually does it for me. . As for the ladies - prefer slim to average with a smart brain and very naughty eyes. hehehe. Oh I like strong women - no princesses for me. . xx Meeks

  • Tart_Du_Jour

    Tart_Du_Jour

    15 years ago

    Thank you Meeka You've brightened up this cold Melbourne day that's for certain.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'curiousnewgirl78'But, like a train wreck, I can't look away even if i don't like what i see, and as i recall, it never ends up in a place I like to be. I like what i like and I like that you like what you like even if i don't like what you like and you don't like what i like, i'd like to think we can all be grownups about it, but like we're likely to read from here on in, some people don't like it like that. xx Sarah (likes the sound of her own tippy-tapping typing)I like what Sarah says. And I like Sarah. I have in the past liked and loved both men and women of all shape, size and safety. I like to reserve the right to like whatever I want, whenever I want!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    And I prefer to be holding a big guy !(but not obese)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Like me perhaps......lol.xxxx

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    We both prefer athletic.Females are generally attracted to thin waist-broad shoulders "V" physique and someone who is taller than them.Males generally like females who are shorter with youthful appearance full breasts and a low waist to hip ratio.In our modern western society the healthier looking specimens are considered the most attractive.DON"T shoot the messenger!!!! This is published research and backed by numerous marketing, lifestyle and health campaigns. Studies show that we are also attracted to our mirror image which makes it easier for us to find partners who are either fat, skinny, athletic or just plain old ugly.There are always exceptions to the general rule.I'm not sure how someone feels safer hugging a cuddly person??? I'm yet to see an overweight SAS trooper or a presidential bodyguard with a spare tyre around his waist. Maybe it is a different kind of safe?Lustful :)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Am sure this war has errupted twice before already...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011'I'm not sure how someone feels safer hugging a cuddly person??? I'm yet to see an overweight SAS trooper or a presidential bodyguard with a spare tyre around his waist. Maybe it is a different kind of safe?Lustful :)But I have to say, the modern idea of a "strong physique" is determined by movies more than any real life examples. Google Fedor Emelianenko (Considered the best fighter in the world until very recently) or Benedikt Magnusson (strongest man in the world) for examples. Or go to a local nightclub and see the different shapes of the bouncers. People always use the military as an example but forget that most of their training is shooting and running, jogging etc (endurance training), and minimal explosive strength or close combat training.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011'I'm not sure how someone feels safer hugging a cuddly person??? I'm yet to see an overweight SAS trooper or a presidential bodyguard with a spare tyre around his waist. Maybe it is a different kind of safe?Lustful :)But I have to say, the modern idea of a "strong physique" is determined by movies more than any real life examples. Google Fedor Emelianenko (Considered the best fighter in the world until very recently) or Benedikt Magnusson (strongest man in the world) for examples. Or go to a local nightclub and see the different shapes of the bouncers. People always use the military as an example but forget that most of their training is shooting and running, jogging etc (endurance training), and minimal explosive strength or close combat training.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'curiousnewgirl78' But, like a train wreck, I can't look away even if i don't like what i see, and as i recall, it never ends up in a place I like to be.I like what i like and I like that you like what you like even if i don't like what you like and you don't like what i like, i'd like to think we can all be grownups about it, but like we're likely to read from here on in, some people don't like it like that.xx Sarah (likes the sound of her own tippy-tapping typing) Thanks

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Has mumonmum just had makeup sex after i bit of a tiff..................cos the forums are exploding with absolute drivel today...........all 3 of them

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    just sex lol,,,,, forum conundrums sorry we will try to titalate you with something different, may be too many sav blancs last nite.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'exitonly'Has mumonmum just had makeup sex after i bit of a tiff..................cos the forums are exploding with absolute drivel today...........all 3 of them i agree....this is shit roxxy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I like Bears! STOMP GRR!                           I also have a little crush on Chuzzy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    really? Ok........hard!! I like em hard, yep everywhere . Hard ass, chest ,arms, strong, fit, hard cock, you name it !!! No veranda over the lolly shop, if he can't see his cock, then I dont wanna either....plain n simple. Yep....hard no squishy pudgy guts, and custard arms for me

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'Chuzzwozza' Quoting 'lustful2011'I'm not sure how someone feels safer hugging a cuddly person??? I'm yet to see an overweight SAS trooper or a presidential bodyguard with a spare tyre around his waist. Maybe it is a different kind of safe?Lustful :)But I have to say, the modern idea of a "strong physique" is determined by movies more than any real life examples. Google Fedor Emelianenko (Considered the best fighter in the world until very recently) or Benedikt Magnusson (strongest man in the world) for examples. Or go to a local nightclub and see the different shapes of the bouncers. People always use the military as an example but forget that most of their training is shooting and running, jogging etc (endurance training), and minimal explosive strength or close combat training. Mr Lustful here :)Modern Era and Movies,,,,You are kidding??? The Greeks and the Romans had defined the perfect physique well before Arni or Sly were running around a movie set.Everything known about the evolution of physical fitness in human bodies, reveals the idea that physical capabilities contribute to the ability to survive and have since the beginning of time. The more physical fitness one has, the more adept at maneuvering the human form and the healthier each physiological system can become. These variables combined provide the greatest opportunity for surviving and thriving. Perhaps this is the reason that physical fitness appeals to something very deep in many people and has thus been correlated in numerous cultures with spiritual and mental development, and is, quite literally a foundation for living that is connected to all we do.People may use the military as an example for they have the necessary skills to protect, defend, repel and attack regardless of terrain, situation or circumstance. Whether they are tired, cold, hungry, hot and exhausted. It would be interesting to see Magnusson or Emelianenko perform after 3 days without sleep or food having possibly walked 100 kms to get to the battle. I see a reality show lolIf you believe shooting and running is the majority of the training for soldiers maybe you should sign up for a few years before you make an unfounded, baseless comment. Unarmed Combat has been part of military training syllabus since Jesus played full back for Jerusalem. Krav Maga is one style commonly used by the Australian MUC Cell. The most in-depth study of the benefits for Crossfit training was undertaken by the military. The military were using Crossfit techniques well before it was tagged "Crossfit". TABATA is commonly used too and there isn't much more explosive than that. Next unfounded statement???Being able to protect another person does not always equate to being able to fight or hold someone off with club like fists. Stolen thread

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I like aeroplanes

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011' Being able to protect another person does not always equate to being able to fight or hold someone off with club like fists. Totally agree Quoting 'TassieRose' Quoting 'exitonly'Has mumonmum just had makeup sex after i bit of a tiff..................cos the forums are exploding with absolute drivel today...........all 3 of them i agree....this is shit roxxySome days, I really like Roxxy LOL Quoting 'rcflyer69'I like aeroplanes But I really like aeroplanes every day!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    But I reckon it's still not such a bad topic. All your talk about hardness DGT makes me very hard....

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'Happytoy1'Like me perhaps......lol.xxxx ...may need to rethink my age limit????? . Kisses Focus

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'Happytoy1' Like me perhaps......lol.xxxx Very sexy!!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'flirty_bi_fem' Quoting 'rcflyer69'I like aeroplanes But I really like aeroplanes every day! If the planets align, one day, maybe I'll be able to take you aviatin'

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011' Quoting 'Chuzzwozza' Quoting 'lustful2011'I'm not sure how someone feels safer hugging a cuddly person??? I'm yet to see an overweight SAS trooper or a presidential bodyguard with a spare tyre around his waist. Maybe it is a different kind of safe?Lustful :)But I have to say, the modern idea of a "strong physique" is determined by movies more than any real life examples. Google Fedor Emelianenko (Considered the best fighter in the world until very recently) or Benedikt Magnusson (strongest man in the world) for examples. Or go to a local nightclub and see the different shapes of the bouncers. People always use the military as an example but forget that most of their training is shooting and running, jogging etc (endurance training), and minimal explosive strength or close combat training. Mr Lustful here :)Modern Era and Movies,,,,You are kidding??? The Greeks and the Romans had defined the perfect physique well before Arni or Sly were running around a movie set.Everything known about the evolution of physical fitness in human bodies, reveals the idea that physical capabilities contribute to the ability to survive and have since the beginning of time. The more physical fitness one has, the more adept at maneuvering the human form and the healthier each physiological system can become. These variables combined provide the greatest opportunity for surviving and thriving. Perhaps this is the reason that physical fitness appeals to something very deep in many people and has thus been correlated in numerous cultures with spiritual and mental development, and is, quite literally a foundation for living that is connected to all we do.People may use the military as an example for they have the necessary skills to protect, defend, repel and attack regardless of terrain, situation or circumstance. Whether they are tired, cold, hungry, hot and exhausted. It would be interesting to see Magnusson or Emelianenko perform after 3 days without sleep or food having possibly walked 100 kms to get to the battle. I see a reality show lolIf you believe shooting and running is the majority of the training for soldiers maybe you should sign up for a few years before you make an unfounded, baseless comment. Unarmed Combat has been part of military training syllabus since Jesus played full back for Jerusalem. Krav Maga is one style commonly used by the Australian MUC Cell. The most in-depth study of the benefits for Crossfit training was undertaken by the military. The military were using Crossfit techniques well before it was tagged "Crossfit". TABATA is commonly used too and there isn't much more explosive than that. Next unfounded statement???Being able to protect another person does not always equate to being able to fight or hold someone off with club like fists. Stolen thread First off, my point was simply that what we consider the "perfect physique" is not necessarily any stronger or more effective than a man with a bit of fat over his abs, which is why I pointed at Magusson and Emelianenko (who served several years in the russian military). Second, it is generally accepted that the greek and roman sculptors utilised quite a bit of artistic license, modelling the heroes as they wished to see them, and for a long time between then and now that was not considered the most practical simply because almost nobody looked like that. The "tough guys" one saw would generally have been farmers, brawlers, laborers, strongmen, soldiers etc. Before the rise of bodybulding, that type of physique was almost unseen, whether on circus strongmen, soldiers, boxers, or anyone else. As for my "unfounded claims" RE the military, they come directly from my brother in law, several ex military co-workers, and several current military friends. They would all agree that although hand to hand training does come up, it is a bare minimum, and although military personnel are certainly not restricted from outside training, its rare to be up for it after carrying 40 kilos around all day. My brother in law had sore shoulders a few days ago from doing countless overhead presses with 30 kilograms, and I dare say he did it for far, far longer than I could. But he cannot OHP 80 kilograms in short, intense sets, if at all, because that would require explosive strength more than endurance. And of course, even if they all lied to me to keep their training top secret, that does not change one simple fact: Not one of the many I know who serve or have served in the military have the "bodybulder physique". Oh, one of them, a grunt, deadlifts almost 300 kilos, as well as having no trouble keeping up with the regular PT drills. But he looks like a big teddy bear. There are plenty of army boys that do have that type of physique, I run into them all the time. But they are in the minority.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Ohh very few seem to have that physique these days, certainly it's a rarity on under 40's. Big barrel chests, thick forearms, legs like tree trunks... with a layer of fat(not that they are fat, they just have some insulation) and fur all over it. Mmmm, nom!Muscles built from physical labour and not hours in the gym, with food being eaten rather than protein drinks and supplements. Think Charlton Heston in those old movies, Charlie Bronson. Men's men apparently.Of course it's impossible to have a 6-8 pack if you have hardly any fat on you at all.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Really, I don't care what shape they are as long as they have a brain, a sense of humour & the stamina to outlast me Though I do like a sexy butt, need something to grab onto & if the're too skinny what am I going to hang onto hummm. Naughty Tess

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I'm sorry was there a point to your reply post?? As I'm very confused.The thread topic was about being attracted to fat or skinny and how Mrs Mum felt safer with her cuddly guy.When someone breaks into my house I will be sure to lift my sofa above my head in one explosive movement and throw it at the assailant, hoping they do not move while it's in flight. Or I could use my brain and think of something a little more practical. Jeez i wonder where I could learn that skill?If Greek and Roman artists used some artistic license they were only subscribing to what the people wanted to see, which basically validates my original statement. People liked athletic :)You wrote "There are plenty of army boys that do have that type of physique, I run into them all the time. But they are in the minority"Which is it??? Plenty or Minority you can't have it both ways unless ya Stalky Again maybe you should sign on that dotted line and not rely on some 3rd hand information especially is it is Top Secret (shhhh we're hunting wabbits)You could of course just YouTube Military Unarmed Combat and let that solve the problem of doubt. Some of the vids date back to '94 in RockhamptonI reckon ya should just join up :)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011'I'm sorry was there a point to your reply post?? As I'm very confused.The thread topic was about being attracted to fat or skinny and how Mrs Mum felt safer with her cuddly guy.When someone breaks into my house I will be sure to lift my sofa above my head in one explosive movement and throw it at the assailant, hoping they do not move while it's in flight. Or I could use my brain and think of something a little more practical. Jeez i wonder where I could learn that skill?If Greek and Roman artists used some artistic license they were only subscribing to what the people wanted to see, which basically validates my original statement. People liked athletic :)You wrote "There are plenty of army boys that do have that type of physique, I run into them all the time. But they are in the minority"Which is it??? Plenty or Minority you can't have it both ways unless ya Stalky Again maybe you should sign on that dotted line and not rely on some 3rd hand information especially is it is Top Secret (shhhh we're hunting wabbits)You could of course just YouTube Military Unarmed Combat and let that solve the problem of doubt. Some of the vids date back to '94 in RockhamptonI reckon ya should just join up :) 1) Probably still a more effective way of dealing with your assailant than simply getting overpowered because he is stronger 2) Yes, they liked athletic. That does not mean it is more effective, which was the entire point of my argument or my question; "why?" 3) "Plenty" does not mean "Majority". There are a few hundred with that physique (plenty), while there are thousands MORE without (Majority). 4) The FIRST hand information comes directly from dozens of people who are serving or have served in the military. Yes, they do train for hand to hand combat. They occasionally do basic joint locks, chokeholds, pressure points and striking, and have the option of additional training if they have the energy after gruelling PT sessions. They sometimes even come into the local MMA gyms, where they are outmatched by the regulars just like anyone else who does not train regularly, unless they decide to become regulars themselves. They generally do not have an edge over the local bouncers or police when they get carried away. Serving in the military does not make a person into Rambo. Most of them are smart enough to understand this, because they are not all naive or stupid.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'rcflyer69' I like aeroplanes I like aeroplane jelly....................id like to have sex in a big blow up pool of it lol...................

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Chuzza, I've worked it out you're a bouncer who could not get in to the military or the cops (if a cop you would know the Aus Mil train the cops in the special stuff) and enjoys waiting for army guys to have a skin full then using your awesome size and fighting abilities throws them out the door when they have let their guard down and most vulnerable. Hmmm did you get your groove on ANZAC day?? Your first hand information from SF and regular infantry or Chocos and pogues??? I will keep my eye out for the bouncers protecting the diplomats here in Iraq or next time I'm in Afghanistan, oh wait... they only employ people who can keep them safe from harm, former soldiers like me :) Oh by the way I have worked the doors of many hard clubs, from the King Street, Kings X up to Orchid Avenue on the Gold Coast. Not one bouncer I met could defeat 150 grains of diplomacy. As James Brown once said "You might know Karate,,,,But I know crazy" Oh the old Rambo line good one I expected it in an earlier post but got there in the end :) I love pissing contests, it's so primal, my girl will be turned on by my manliness. Peace out !!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'lustful2011'Chuzza, I've worked it out you're a bouncer who could not get in to the military or the cops (if a cop you would know the Aus Mil train the cops in the special stuff) and enjoys waiting for army guys to have a skin full then using your awesome size and fighting abilities throws them out the door when they have let their guard down and most vulnerable. Hmmm did you get your groove on ANZAC day?? Your first hand information from SF and regular infantry or Chocos and pogues??? I will keep my eye out for the bouncers protecting the diplomats here in Iraq or next time I'm in Afghanistan, oh wait... they only employ people who can keep them safe from harm, former soldiers like me :) Oh by the way I have worked the doors of many hard clubs, from the King Street, Kings X up to Orchid Avenue on the Gold Coast. Not one bouncer I met could defeat 150 grains of diplomacy. As James Brown once said "You might know Karate,,,,But I know crazy" Oh the old Rambo line good one I expected it in an earlier post but got there in the end :) I love pissing contests, it's so primal, my girl will be turned on by my manliness. Peace out !! Yes, I am a bouncer. I have never been interested in joining the military, but only because I like being able to choose the hours I work. I have been in townsville for two years, and I have worked at the pub closest to the barracks among other places. For the two months I worked at that particular venue however, I didnt get into a single fight because most people were easy enough to convince that drunken brawls are not the right thing to do. As well as that, the toughest guy there was a regular, an ex SAS trooper known by everyone who lived just up the road and drank there every friday & saturday night. He is about 5'10 with a skinny build, nothing special, but the bodybuilder types with the "perfect physique" you are so convinced make up the entire military all kept their distance from him. He was one of those who sought out as much training as possible, and he was no normal grunt. He is one of the many I have spoken to, along with a large variety of others ranging from infantrymen to engineers. Its quite amusing that you have taken my posts as an attack on the military, despite the fact that I have stated numerous times that many of those I have spoken to about this topic are my friends and ex-military co-workers. I have never once stated that the entire military are weak, simply that the training is not all designed for hand to hand combat. They are soldiers, not MMA fighters. There are surely more than a handful who would beat me in a fight, an im sure any single person serving in the military would beat me in a gunfight. And the security for foreign diplomats in warzones, employed by the government, are obviously going to be trained for handling themselves in a warzone, by the government. But most of the world is not a warzone. Its no easy feat to run 10 kilometres with a 40 kg backpack or empty an assault rifle into a target 100 metres away, but when a pair of blokes have me and a lady friend trapped in an alleyway and there is no gun in reach, I would take maximum explosive strength and MMA training over all round training. The optimal training system for defending yourself in a warzone for days at a time, with guns, is obviously going to be different to the way one would train for handling yourself in fights unlikely to last more than five minutes with hands, feet, and occasional improvised weapons on the street, where a fight outside of a warzone is more likely to occur. Put it this way, who would win a pitched battle between the australian military and the roman army on a modern battlefield? The australian military, of course. What if they all had swords intead of guns? Well, obviously those who trained with swords would win. Who would win between a lone soldier and a dedicated mixed martial artist in a gunfight? Obviously the soldier. What if they were unarmed? The answer is just as obvious, and that was the point I was trying to make. The modern military are trained for the modern warzone, and anything else would be stupidity. They may end up in a situation where they are unable to reach their weapon, so of course that is taken into account. But that is less likely, so naturally less time is spent training for such a situation. I dont think anyone could possibly be foolish enough to deny that, so im left with three possibilities; either this entire argument has been a misunderstanding, you are arguing for the sake of arguing, or you think that the military are simply the best at absolutely everything, including things outside their intended purpose, simply by virtue of being the military. Warzone = warzone. Soldiers trained for warzone. Others trained for not warzone. People trained for not warzone better trained for not warzone than people trained for warzone. And of course, none of that takes away from my original point; Whether military or not, a man who looks like hercules is not necessarily better in any way than a man who looks like a slightly chubby version.