RHP

RHP User

M49 F44

What genre are you?

December 09 2010

OK its been bothering me for a while now after Andys post about sexual classification. Ive been thinking on it a fair bit & have finally decided what I am. lol . I have decided I am a Recreational Bisexual! lol Im not curious any more ...Ive done it! And I dont do it for him...if they wanna watch thats fine but it only adds a bit of excitement...I would wanna do it any way. But Im not a proper Bi either as if we stopped swinging then I probably wouldnt seek it out on its own ( I dont think...of course withdrawals wont start til I abstain...so I could well be unknowingly addicted *shock*) I like being with a woman as part & parcel of sexy fun whether with a man, for their enjoyment or on our own. I have also decided that Mr H is an Opportunistic Bisexual. He wont actively seek it out...but if things happen in the heat of the moment he is unlikely to say no. Love RB & OB ps; If you have since decided what you are or have heard of a new term by all means tell us! I find it all so intriguing!

Comments

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    well I have been told I am a cheeky fucker ???? does that mean I give or recieve ????

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    If I need to label my sexuality then I would have to go with Hetero-INflexible. Never had the slightest desire to even so much as kiss another woman. I have had a momentary thought about it every now and then but when it all boils down to it....I like the guys. Oh and Andy? When people say you are a cheeky fucker, they are not talking about your sexuality...You ARE a cheeky fucker. lol.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    i like it. it spans and transcends genders and labels. and has a pleasingly pagan ring to it.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    now i feel all disappointed here I was hoping to have a discusion about fiction no-fiction and the varying classifictaions within (I mean andy is a writer afterall so tis natural for me to think this) and I am confronted with sexuality...hmmm I have been described as the following: pansexual - in that I am attracted to a person regardless of gender but who they are...pretty well describes me I feel. Kiusses Focus

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'focusliason' now i feel all disappointed here I was hoping to have a discusion about fiction no-fiction and the varying classifictaions within (I mean andy is a writer afterall so tis natural for me to think this) and I am confronted with sexuality...hmmm I have been described as the following: pansexual - in that I am attracted to a person regardless of gender but who they are...pretty well describes me I feel. Kiusses Focus oh where oh where did you ever get that wonderful classification from :PTR

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'focusliason' now i feel all disappointed here I was hoping to have a discusion about fiction no-fiction and the varying classifictaions within (I mean andy is a writer afterall so tis natural for me to think this) and I am confronted with sexuality...hmmm I have been described as the following: pansexual - in that I am attracted to a person regardless of gender but who they are...pretty well describes me I feel. Kiusses Focus I second that motion, Focus. I, too am a little disappointed and feel misled. I do suppose, though, that you COULD classify a lot written herein as "Fiction"? Admittedly, I do like the connotations brought to mind with the use of Pansexual. One that sticks in my mind that I have heard a while ago, and please know that I am not using the descriptive on you, is Omni-sexual. Have a think on that one.As for myself, I am simply Heterosexual but that is where the "simple" ends.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    If I was going to try to put a slick, hip and cool new tag on it...why not metro-lesbian? I dress well and I really like women. | Just read the consumer warning.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Im bi potential :Plove the idea of bi play... still waiting for the right opportunity...:PLS

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Can't be trysexual as I have... more like..."moodysexual" as it depends on one's mood in the moment... or whether something or many things about them puts me "in the mood" NymphetamineDrm

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Quoting 'Total_Recall' oh where oh where did you ever get that wonderful classification from :PTR Hmmm now I wonder???? lol Kisses Focus

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    I have an intention to explore bi but havent had the opportunity yet... and bi-curious just sounds cheesy... im not curious... Im turned on by it... I just havent found the right opportunity for that to manifest...labels in general tho... who needs em?one of my fav labels is vegaquarian - describing someone thats a vegetarian and eats fish too.fun play on words :)LS

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    straight roxxy...as straight as they come

  • RHP

    RHP User

    15 years ago

    Pansexual? I think animals...only because in some of the novels I read a panwere could change into lots of animals....lol But Im guessing Pan means many? Cool! People I did say SEXUAL classification...but yeah I know genre & classification are not quite the right words...Sorry to mislead you All the others rock too! I love fun labels...but we dont need to get bogged down by them ;-) LS... I like to man-ifest too ;-) Mrs H xxxxxxxx