F42
To cut or not to cut? that is the question
June 18 2012
Comments
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Please don't cut Men are born with a foreskin for a reason , if we cut our little daughters flaps off to keep them " cleaner" it would be outrageous!!! Men with foreskins are gorgeous and fun to play with ! My hubby is cut due to his age , so I'd never turn one away if done or not, but my preference absolutely is for uncut cocks!!
-
RHP User
14 years ago
As the lovely Del has stated guys around my age more often then not ( read that as my sexual history..) Had been cut. It's only since we have gone down this path have experienced "otherwise". It's been a bit of an eye opener all the differences in foreskins that you see but that's just like vaginas so Im not sure why I should have been surprised. One of the yummiest cocks I think I have ever seen is uncut and previous to seeing this perfect looking cock I'd have probably said uncut. In the scheme of things though its not how it looks but how they use it that counts. Also this goes into the big tits vrs little tits innies vrs outties which kind of goes against my grain as it can lead to a sence of one being better then the other which is a load of crappola. It's very much an each to their own personal choice and should be kept that way not a majority rules is best syndrome.on a side note... I've seen on parenting forums this type of arguement about to circ or not circ your child,make normal women turn into screaming banshees so the days of uncut being a dime a dozen are over me thinks..
-
erotictouch4u
14 years ago
As a few of you ladies have said, men around my age were automatically cut at birth (literally a pinch of the thumbnail) as a hygene thing where young boys might not clean under it often enough as they growup. But as times and medical opnions change this practice has mostly died away. Not having one I have not missed it but know of a friend who was uncut and had a painfull experience of it tearing during sex with the horror of copious amounts of blood and a race off to the emergency ward. ET xox
-
RHP User
14 years ago
I love the pure masculinity of uncut. I'm not one of those women who find penises ugly, I think they're awesome and enticing and yum. Uncut, more to enjoy :)
-
RHP User
14 years ago
I really don't care as long as it's clean... There was never a question for our girls to be done so when our boys came along the answer was obvious to me... we don't pull out our fingernails or teeth to avoid cleaning them... girls bits aren't cut off in civilized societies... why do it to boys? How on earth did your friend's foreskin tear during sex ET???????
-
RHP User
14 years ago
A nicely manicured manhood any day of the week!
-
RHP User
14 years ago
I think they look the same when erect, so I don't really notice if they're cut or uncut.Perhaps I'm not paying enough attention?
-
erotictouch4u
14 years ago
Quoting 'justswingingbi'How on earth did your friend's foreskin tear during sex ET??????? I seem to remember it was a case of she got too tight and dry (probably because she was not into it) and he didn't stop for the lube (probably too drunk) though he didn't want to admit it ET xox
-
RHP User
14 years ago
This is question that comes up time and time again and it's nice to see the entirely embracing attitude of our RHP ladies. What this means to me is that we see there is more to a man than whether a medical professional sliced his foreskin off or not. For me personally, I simply don't mind either way and I'd never make a decision to play/not play based on the presence/absence of foreskin. I'm more used to uncut so find them easier to 'drive'...but I'll give uncut ones a damned good go at driving them equally well 😜. Neither of my sons are cut...never even entered my mind and I agree that future generations (in Australia at least) will not even be asking the question!
-
RHP User
14 years ago
a foreskin is like owning a convertible, you can drive it with the top up or down ;) no preference here, though a covered wagon is easier to manipulate by hand
-
RHP User
14 years ago
the foreskin is there for a purpose.. to protect the head...and when you put your cock against some puffy flaps and push, it pulls the skin back and slides in...like it should :) For looks, pull the skin back...they look the same. again...guys...make sure you CLEAN under forskin so theres no smell taste to put off the girls... common sence really, but many lack that it seems ..haha
-
tomrach79
14 years ago
There are some good points made. Men have foreskins for a reason. Same with pubic hair. But it's fair to say the invention of clothes removed that reason - to protect it. Women and many men have no pubic hair these days because it now longer has a purpose... Same with foreskin?
-
playfulpirate
14 years ago
I'm an uncut and think cutting is barbaric. Its easy to keep it sqeaky clean. I have been complimented on how clean it is a few times in fact by women that have had both. In our society there is no need to cut. I've know people who have been cut later in life for medical reasons and they say there is no difference. Thank your lucky stars your not orthodox Jewish, the rabbi bites it off the baby ewww. Plus with uncut you can do more tricks!!! Also having your foreskin sucked is great, I have encountered the 'splitty' a small tear at the base. But it heals up quick and is no worse than a shaving cut. Get in there and embrace the foreskin girls
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Quoting 'lil_bit_angelic' I love the pure masculinity of uncut. I'm not one of those women who find penises ugly, I think they're awesome and enticing and yum. Uncut, more to enjoy :) That's how I feel about women who have women's bodies, at my age I expect and appreciate a woman's body that reflects her maturity.
-
playful4u
14 years ago
Visually, being cut is more of an attractive package, because it looks good when it's either flacid, semi-on or ready for lift off...(Houston, we are good to launch) ===> When it's hard, well...Dick is Dick and they all look kind of the same, subject to individual shapes and sizes. But, when it is soft or in semi-on mode, it does feel like a there is just a bit too much loose skin compared to cut, it all comes down to preference. Mr has been cut from birth due to popularity of the times, we are both happy with the feel plus the visual pleasure and that's what counts. As a side note: Our son has calls a penis a weenis, LOL, which just cracks us up, so in our home we use the term "Weenis". Weenis TM (Weenis is a trademark name owned by Playful4u)
-
newdimension
14 years ago
Men who have been cut have missed out on all the fun you can have with a 4skin , just look at the guys in Puppetry of the Penis lol . Older men from a european background you will find are mostly uncut ( being cut was one way the Nazis knew you where a jew ) and yes our cocks are more sensetive lol , you woman just imagine your clit hanging out all the time rubbing against your underwear :-)
-
RHP User
14 years ago
I was raised by the uncut generation, as such I had to figure out penis hygeine on my own. There were a few years of intermittent inflammation before my discovery. In a word - OWWW! On the plus side though, you wouldn't believe how useful a foreskin can be after learning how to satisfy one's own urges. Incoming mess? No problem! Just pinch the tip and consider it caught. A guy can get by owning fewer pairs of socks that way;)
-
RHP User
14 years ago
As a uncut male who has never had any complaints. Always amuses me when a lady get's down to play with it and they get that silly grin on their face to see what they can do with it... Specially when it becomes so hard then they cant get the skin back down to how it was when they started.. lol So who am I to complain with all this extra handling... lol...
-
Ohtilts
14 years ago
LMAO @ newdimension......i couldnt have said it any better myself
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Quoting 'tomrach79' There are some good points made. Men have foreskins for a reason. Same with pubic hair. But it's fair to say the invention of clothes removed that reason - to protect it. Women and many men have no pubic hair these days because it now longer has a purpose... Same with foreskin? My only though on this would be that if the foreskin truly was no longer necessary why has evolution not bred them out?
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Quoting 'playfulpirate'Thank your lucky stars your not orthodox Jewish, the rabbi bites it off the baby ewww. For everyone's information that's not true. There are practical and religious reasons why that can't possibly be the case. I won't go into details because it'll be off topic. Suffice it to say if a rabbi were doing the circumcision they'd be using sterile equipment. I doubt that's legal in Australia and rightly so, if anyone is removing foreskins, it should be surgeons in a clinical setting. Quoting 'tomrach79'There are some good points made. Men have foreskins for a reason. Same with pubic hair. But it's fair to say the invention of clothes removed that reason - to protect it. Women and many men have no pubic hair these days because it now longer has a purpose... Same with foreskin? There is quite a gulf between body hair that can be removed harmlessly and a protective part of genitalia. I don't think that a sensitive, delicate part that receives blood supply can be so easily classified as of being no value and removed without thought. Even assuming for moment that a foreskin is "useless", and I'm not, it's a very dangerous road to start classifying human body parts on a sliding scale of usefulness or necessity and then removing the optional extras... Personally I'm very pro-foreskin. Interested people should Google the Foreskin Awareness Project started by a Canadian activist. That said, I'd never tell a man who was circumcised that his genitals were ugly or inferior. Men shouldn't have nasty things said about their genitals any more than women should. Especially since the overwhelming majority of circumcised men had the procedure done when they were infants rather than as an informed adult choice.
-
RHP User
14 years ago
is individual....tho we prefer 'cut' as neither of us enjoys the look of a cock with foreskin, and this, along with body/genital hair is absolutely enough to be a deal breaker.
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Mr Halo I can't agree more. Mr 2 was cut as an infant but when having our own son and researching what is actually done there was no way we were walking into that surgery. As has been said a few times before here, either I'm with the not real observant or it really makes no difference but I dont even notice when I'm with a new partner. Possibly if we are removing bits of people that are useless or unused then for some there are far more useless items of their anatomy that can be removed, unused brains are rather common out there. ???
-
RHP User
14 years ago
If a boy gets circumcised, its called circumcision.If a girl gets circumcised, its called genital mutilation.And just off topic, I'm definitely of the opinion that a pickle does belong in a Big Mac, I wouldn't have it any other way. That being said those pickles are cut!
-
RHP User
14 years ago
I have an uncut penis and i believe i get the best of both worlds.... any way when Im properly hard the head of my cock comes out any way.......also the foreskin helps with masturbation (solo. or ..helped) without lubrication ... so a bit of fun in public is all to easy and from what i know guys that are not ...are much more and get much more sensation>>>>>>LOVE IT
-
RHP User
14 years ago
a friend of mine had it cut in his mid 20s and he said he has lost senation in sex. I am uncut and wont change it for he world. Its true i might not last as long as a person who is cut. But I have more sensation, all i neeed to do is learn to master of keeping my self at the 80% level of sensation and sex will be magical.And like everyone above said... Once its hard it all looks the same
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Is a beutiful thing, if it is attached to a lovely man.Cut ,uncut,large,small....it is what he does with it afterall.xHugs H
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Natural is best for me.. Such a turn on for me when i look at my guys cock in all its glory. But thats just my opinion and I do believe that circumcision is sometimes necessary. But foreskin is natural so why fix something that isnt broken? There was a previous post on the exact same topic. I have left my sons intact and when they are old enough, then they can make their own decision on whether to remain that way or be circumsized. However if there were medical problems involved then I would be the first one to have them circumcised. Each to their own. But to me Foreskin is the best.!!!
-
RHP User
14 years ago
Quoting 'justswingingbi' My only though on this would be that if the foreskin truly was no longer necessary why has evolution not bred them out? Evolution involves passing traits from one generation to the next, with some sort of pressure that makes some characteristics more likely to be passed on than others, as well as a bit of random jiggling thrown in for good measure. I'll see if I can answer your question without using the word 'penis' more than once:) In order for evolution to do away with the foreskin, we'd first need people who have the 'hatless willy' gene (you heard it here first) floating around already. On top of that, you'd also need a reason why people with the pre-snipped gene are more likely to breed and pass it along to a new foreskin-free generation, ie. the majority of women finding uncut penises disgusting enough to take sex off the table (and surgical circumcision being outlawed). I'm very glad that's not the case, but if it was then theoretically those born without their turtlenecks would have more children on average than those who weren't. This would keep happening as following generations were born, with the proportion of naturally exposed tips increasing with each cycle, until they made up virtually the entire population and the foreskin existed nowhere outside of cave-paintings and museums:) As for why foreskins are still wandering the streets - while people are occasionally born without foreskins (it's called aposthia, yeah google!), it may not be genetic and therefore can't be passed on. Also, partly based on what's been written in this thread, having a foreskin doesn't really seem to disadvantage anybody when it comes to passing on genetic material (most romantic phrase ever). Because I don't get enough geek going during the work week, J
-
realcouple4u
14 years ago
Spent the day with a girl once , at the end of a day of playing she looked at me and said im glad your Cut , i said LOOK AGAIN !! she now does not care uncut or cut So from that i take away it makes no difference
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 15123 Comments: 88158
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1417 Comments: 10229
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2521 Comments: 11677
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2506 Comments: 9759
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 1009 Comments: 5264
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1303 Comments: 5776
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 782 Comments: 1988
-
LGBT
Topics: 170 Comments: 867
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share