DiscreetCpl4u

DiscreetCpl4u

M64 F64

Circumcised or not - girls what's your preference

March 09 2015

My wife has a very strong preference that guys we play with have cut cocks. In fact its a deal breaker if the guy is not circumcised. We received a chat request the other night from a guy keen to meet. The chat was going well until we asked if he was circumcised. He wasn't. We politely told him that it would not work for us. This guy then got quite narky and demanded to know what was wrong with uncut cocks. Clearly he doesn't have the intelligence to realise that women have the right to have preferences. So a few questions for the girls, Do you prefer circumcised cocks? Do any females prefer uncircumcised? Or do you have zero preference?

Comments

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I have been a 'oh good, he's circumcised' girl. (I don't know, just seemed 'cleaner' somehow) So my preference was for circumcised. Until recently. My current friend is not circumcised. And I adore what he has to offer me! Have no problem with it whatsoever! So maybe, for me at least, it's not about what he has so much as what he has to offer...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    because as long as the man keeps it clean, an "uncut cock" should not pose a problem. I suggest that before sex occurs that the man wash that area thoroughly by pulling back the foreskin and using a dermatological tested soap free wash meant for sensitive skin, on it to ensure it is "ultra" clean. Fellatio can still be performed on a clean "uncut" cock if need be without adverse reactions from the woman. An "uncut cock" is natural. That is how men were born. The foreskin protects the head of the penis so that it remains sensitive. It's quite barbaric having to have that part of the body "snipped" off. However, I do realise that "circumcision" in some religions is a must. But the sensitivity of the head of the penis is reduced. Hence the need for lots of lubricant. Amy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    But not a deal breaker... - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    How is a reduction in sensativotu of the head and lube related? - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    test sensitivity between cut and uncut cocks - understanding that we're all different - without having said circumcision?? And.... Post circumcision....what happens if they want it back on?? - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Who asks up front.... really?! And who... at the point of no return says..... "oh, you're circumcised?!... ok... no thanks.... I prefer the wizards sleeve look". I have never asked a woman if she has inverted nipples.... or protruding labia.... etc

  • AnnieWhichway

    AnnieWhichway

    11 years ago

    But never knocked the other back for that. Not sure about Amy's statement regarding cut ones needing extra lube for sensitivity. Sort of thing only a bloke could answer who has had a late circumcision.Not as though she used to have one...... "Annie, did you just say that?" sigh...........

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'simple_desires' How is a reduction in sensativotu of the head and lube related? - Posted from rhpmobile You're right, they're not related other than both being potential outcomes of being cut. The lube makes up for the lack of mechanical lubrication with the foreskin missing. OP - You have a right to a preference as we all do but no need to question the guys intelligence. He is well within his rights to question why he was rejected for having a naturally occurring body part!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Ive been married to both types. When they are hard, makes no difference. The only thing is the cleanliness of uncut needs to be maintained. Feels no different bonking either type to me.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Cock'l do 😜xxFreya

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    it is not a dealbreaker. Overall cleanliness, personal hygiene and pride in one's appearance is what counts.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Hotnhotter is correct. "The lube makes up for the lack of mechanical lubrication with the foreskin missing." Without the foreskin, the head of the penis becomes dry. I look at it this way. With the head of the penis dry and exposed, won't it tend to rub on the clothing and thus get used to friction ? Just a thought of mine. Another way of looking at this is to consider ourselves. If our female bits are dry (ie. the clitoris) and we masturbate, do we take a longer time to come ? If so why ? We are lucky. Our clitoris, the equivalent of the male penis, is protected from getting dry by the labia. I have both "uncut" and "cut" men in my life. The "sensitivity" statement came from my husband. I suppose the best person to know whether "uncut" is more sensitive to "cut" would be to talk to a man that had been circumcised at a later age in his life. A friend of ours had this done for medical reasons and from experience, he stated that the sensitivity of his penis was reduced. Hence he took a longer time to get hard and come. Amy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    My hubby is circumcised and is neither "dry" or needs lube. Not sure where you got your info from ??? - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    He reports no difference inubrication or sensativity. most men loose some sensitivity as they age. Not related to cut or uncut. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    **In lubrication - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I'd be offended if I was rejected because of a naturally occurring body part. I'd also be offended if my intelligence was questioned because I was offended. Perhaps it would be better to put your flap or no flap preferences up on your profile so that there are no more offences taken 😳 - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    ...the foreskin draws back, completely exposing the head of it. Not half or a quarter of it. That skin, now bunched behind the head, is now a source of friction...leading to pleasure. That's the mechanics of it at its simplest...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Zero preference. Its the guy attached to it who is the most important thing to me.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I like them both the same :-D

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Cut, I never knew why, I think because I had older sisters they may have drummed it into me about being cleaner, now though? I absolutely do not care, I wouldn't even ask 😊 - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I was just going on what my husband has said to me. He's "uncut". The skin on the head of the penis of a man who is circumcised seems drier to me. But then again, you did mention that age could be a factor in affecting sensitivity too. I'm definitely learning some things here on RHP. Thank you. Amy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Not his cock !!! Big, small, long, short, skinny, thick, cut and uncut. All this makes no difference to how I view a man. It's always his personality and whether I am attracted to him and it that counts. Amy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I like my bananas peeled.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Probably because I encounter them most frequently, I prefer cut. However I don't ask and it's not a deal breaker for me.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    It doesn't make any difference to me, as long as it's kept clean 😊 - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    ....that hubby is uncut. We have this specifically because it is a preference for some women and we've experienced the offense and general sad feelings where when the lady found out he was natural, she pulled the plug. It was not a nice feeling for hubby and made him feel bad about himself - and I think that is not okay (but accept we all have preferences). So now we say it up front - that way we are protected from that any any subsequent negative emotions. And in my experience, I have noticed that cut willies are dryer than uncut ones - does it make a difference?...not to me. I watched a doco about it, and there was a reason, but can't remember for the life of me what is was ☺️ (and if I had the energy, I would have looked it..but I don't). And finally, to answer the question OP, I have no preference either way, but opted against getting my two boys cut (they can make that choice as adults if they choose). Just my two cents worth... Inadditionto (Mrs) - Posted from rhpmobile

  • MissBishere

    MissBishere

    11 years ago

    zero

  • Lovinit28andKC72

    Lovinit28andKC72

    11 years ago

    No preference here, as to cut or uncut....💋

  • JohnAnn2227

    JohnAnn2227

    11 years ago

    Cut please! Definitely a deal breaker.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Definitely cut!!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I don't mind either way. Good hygiene is a must for both cut and uncut. That is the deal breaker for me. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I don't really get the fuss about a cut cock, cleanliness I would say is an individual thing, not a dick thing. If a guy hasn't washed, he hasn't washed regardless of the foreskin presence and who doesn't like a squeaky clean cock to wrap their mouth around. I am more worried about how they are going to use that cock.

  • LifeUnscripted

    LifeUnscripted

    11 years ago

    I suddenly feel like I should put that fact highlighted on my profile. ;) Seriously wouldn't want to disappoint people that much. Honestly it surprises me. In the U.S. the majority of men are cut, so in the lifestyle it is unusual to see an uncut man. I was the first for a number of our partners. I guess I should just feel lucky that they seemed to enjoy themselves fine. I guess my real question would be why? Especially when hard there doesn't seem to be much difference.... - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'LifeUnscripted' I suddenly feel like I should put that fact highlighted on my profile. ;) Seriously wouldn't want to disappoint people that much. Honestly it surprises me. In the U.S. the majority of men are cut, so in the lifestyle it is unusual to see an uncut man. I was the first for a number of our partners. I guess I should just feel lucky that they seemed to enjoy themselves fine. I guess my real question would be why? Especially when hard there doesn't seem to be much difference.... - Posted from rhpmobile If someone looked at my cock and said no because I'm au naturel then I'd just assume they were scared of it's magnificence and thought they weren't worthy. No way I'm ever going to feel bad about it! It's similar here in Oz, most guys our age would be cut so that is what women would mostly see. With the younger kids now it is totally the opposite and over time circumcised men will become a minority. As for all the comments about cleanliness, foreskin or not hygiene is important and it's pretty easy to keep clean. Probably a lot easier than keeping a pussy clean! Mr HnH