M52 F48
Aarows
March 01 2011
Comments
-
RHP User
15 years ago
They have to be kidding themselves. What a crock of shit. How do they explain away the fact that they made inspections for certificate of occupancy? I mean, private cubicles, a suckatorium and rooms with cages, condom and lube dispensors on every wall in can hardly be anything else. .. And it's been open for like.... a hundred years. HugsS
-
RHP User
15 years ago
From the news reports the Council's complaint seems to be that they consider that the premises is being used as a restricted premises, or a brothel, rather than as a "social club". The application for development consent advised council that men would go there to meet socially, that the clientelle would predominantly be homosexual men and that whilst management does not encourage sex, some sex is likely to occur between patrons.The problem for Council is that the premises is not a brothel as nobody pays anybody for sex... they're all giving it away for free damn it!!!.... and that it doesn't seem to be a restricted premises under the NSW restricted Premises Act. Really, I think Councillors all need to get laid as they seem a little uptight over this problem. Next, they'll be slamming close down orders on the beaches, the toilets at the RSL club, carparks, elevators, car bonnets, behind the back garden shed... anywhere that people have sex.... HugsS
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 15123 Comments: 88157
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1417 Comments: 10229
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2521 Comments: 11672
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2506 Comments: 9759
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 1008 Comments: 5262
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1303 Comments: 5776
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 782 Comments: 1988
-
LGBT
Topics: 170 Comments: 867
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets

reply
like
Share